Archive for the Barack Obama Topic


Literary Smackdown: Obama, Fox News, and Sitting Bull

1Barack-Obama-Of-Thee-I-Sing-Book.jpgThe sordid ephemera of politics have spread even to our most innocent cultural products: children’s books. During the past election season, there was “The Tea Party Coloring Book for Kids,” from a Missouri publisher whose owner said that he started receiving death threats after the book got national coverage, with one caller claiming that he’d like to put him in a “chloroform headlock.” And then there was “The Liberal Clause: Socialism on a Sleigh”—written by David Hedrick, who lost in the Republican primary for a House seat in Washington—an illustrated chestnut wherein Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and a dour-looking approximation of Harry Reid (along with special guests Stalin and Mao) conspire to attack freedom and spoil Christmas.

Entering the fray this week is Obama’s own children’s book, “Of Thee I Sing,” in which he uses the stories of famous Americans—Jackie Robinson, Georgia O’Keeffe, George Washington, etc.—to illustrate life lessons to his daughters. (Obama submitted the manuscript before taking office, and the profits from the book will be donated to the Fisher House Foundation, a fund for the children of soldiers who have been disabled or killed.) Sounds harmless enough, but a sitting President (or, as we’ve seen, a former one) can’t seem to publish a book without upsetting a large number of people.

Cue this week’s literary smackdown. In one corner is Fox Nation, a news and opinion Web site run by Fox News, which on Monday ran this headline about Obama’s new book: “Obama Praises Indian Chief Who Killed U.S. General.” (The site has since defanged the headline, “for historical accuracy” as an editor’s note puts it, to “Obama Praises Indian Chief Who Defeated U.S. General,” but the hyperlink remains: “http://nation.foxnews.com/media/2010/11/15/obama-praises-indian-chief-who-killed-us-general.”) Potential responses upon reading this headline: Outrageous! Unpatriotic! Anti-military (that profits-for-military-families thing aside)! Just another example of Obama’s America-last worldview! But what’s really going on here? The short Fox Nation post quotes a story from USA Today that noted among the characters that Obama features, “his most controversial choice may be Sitting Bull, who defeated Custer at Little Bighorn….” (Defeated Custer’s army, that is, rather than killed Custer himself—hence the Fox Nation correction. And even the new headline is a stretch, since the military victory is credited to Crazy Horse and Gall, rather than to Sitting Bull.)

foxnation.jpg

That was it: A headline, which was later changed, in which Fox Nation made a relatively true statement that, without context, communicated a generally false overall message. Misleading is probably the right word, since Obama has clearly not written a book for kids about American military embarrassments. (In an odd juxtaposition, the permanent sidebar feature on the Fox Nation site shows a photo of two men in full headdresses under the words: “Fox Nation Salutes: November Marks Native American Heritage Month.”)

This leads to the other corner, occupied by commentators on the left, who seized upon this relatively minor Webisode as more evidence of Fox News’s evil, insidious fear-mongering. Jay Bookman’s post for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, is a good example of this position:

You see, Fox readers have been pre-programmed to believe that Obama is anti-American and “anti-colonial,” and once such a meme has been implanted, even the most far-fetched of examples can be used to re-incite and reinforce it.

Over the past few days, there’s been plenty of mutual sneering, from those who think that Obama’s book celebrates an enemy combatant, and those who see the Fox Nation headline as misreporting current news and misreading history.

And here’s where the smackdown devolves into a free-for-all. Few things are as insufferable as fights in Web comments over the “meaning of history,” and this battle begins to lose its literary pedigree as you make the disheartening trip down the threads on various sites. Most opinions can be divided into two camps:

Custer deserves a large portion of credit for the Confederate’s defeat during the 3rd day of Gettysburg, which largely changed the course of the war.

Obama should have avoided such a controversial figure, but we are talking about a guy who honored Indonesian veterans more than our veterans this past Vet’s Day. A disgrace.

Or:

Get a life Custer was a butcher, who killed women and children without a second thought. He deserved what he got, too bad it was no sooner.

Some interesting matters have been discussed, though, such as: Can we call Sitting Bull an American at all? Would he have accepted such a title, and do his descendants recognize it today? The source material, meanwhile, is as apolitical and careful as the response has been vitriolic. Obama presents Sitting Bull as a non-denominational healer:

Sitting Bull was a Sioux medicine man
who healed broken hearts and broken promises.
It is fine that we are different, he said.
“For peace, it is not necessary for eagles to be crows.”
Though he was put in prison,
his spirit soared free on the plains,
and his wisdom
touched the generations.

The story may lack historical nuance, but this is a children’s book after all, where metaphor and analogy normally trump particulars, and for good reason. We’ll keep an eye out to see if any of the other figures in “Of Thee I Sing” spark similar controversy.

And the winner is: No one, in this case. This smackdown reveals the pettiest elements of our politics, wherein partisans simply see in the other side exactly what they expect. I’ll give the last word to Johnny Cash, and his barbed and hilarious “Custer,” from the 1964 album “Bitter Tears: Ballads of the American Indian.”

Posted on Nov 18th, 2010 by Ian Crouch in Barack Obama, Fox News, Literary Smackdown, Of Thee I Sing, Sitting Bull |

The Exchange: Ari Berman on “Herding Donkeys” and the Midterms

This post is part of The New Yorker’s ongoing coverage of the midterm elections.

Dem_v_Repub100.jpg

As Barack Obama ran to the Presidency in 2008, he was called a once-in-a-generation candidate. But as Ari Berman details in his new book, “Herding Donkeys: The Fight to Rebuild the Democratic Party and Reshape American Politics,” Obama’s win did not result simply from his unique attributes. Berman, a political correspondent for The Nation, tracks the rapid evolution of Democratic Party politics from Howard Dean’s electrifying but disorganized Presidential run beginning in 2003, to Dean’s development of a “fifty-state” election strategy as head of the Democratic National Committee, to the “frequently overlooked and untold stories of the organizers and activists who labored in obscurity to make [Obama’s] victory a reality.” This week, I checked in with Berman about what the past decade might tell us about the current political climate and about Tuesday’s midterm elections.

The country’s political mood seems to have swung so quickly and severely in just two years. Of the lessons you’ve drawn from 2004, 2006, and 2008, do any still hold true? What looks different today?

Lesson number one is: beware of predictions of electoral realignments! Karl Rove was mistaken to believe that George W. Bush’s reëlection heralded a “permanent Republican majority,” while Democrats were naïve to think that Obama’s election and the large Democratic Congressional majority that resulted from elections in 2006 and 2008 signaled a new progressive era. In this day and age, politics seems to change in a blink of an eye.

herding.jpg

But I do think we’ve entered a new political era where grassroots mobilization is really important and political innovation counts for a great deal. Bush was incredibly successful at turning out his supporters in 2004 and Democrats learned from that experience and figured out how to broaden their political coalition and expand into new terrain in 2006 and 2008, bringing a lot of new energy and supporters into the party. And now, two years later, Tea Partiers are doing a similar thing on the Republican side.

Two years after Obama’s Presidential campaign, does his win—and the Democrats’ success more generally—seem to you to have been anomaly? Or are there durable lessons that we can take from the community-organizing principles that went into winning the election?

It was a rare political moment, but I don’t think Obama’s election was an anomaly. In many ways, his election represented the fruition of a grassroots political movement that started with Howard Dean’s insurgent campaign for the presidency in 2003. Dean ran the first campaign of the twenty-first century and Obama was able to perfect the new model that Dean pioneered, first as a Presidential candidate and then as chairman of the Democratic Party from 2003 to 2008. Both candidates drastically reduced the barriers for entry in politics and tried get as many people involved in as many places in as many different ways. And, in doing so, they built an alternate power base that could bypass the traditional political establishment.

Republicans—and the Tea Party specifically—definitely studied these methods and have used them in 2010. I just wrote a piece for TheAtlantic.com about this called “Dean 3.0: What the Tea Party Can Learn from Democrats in 2010 and Beyond.” The Tea Party has raised a significant sum of money over the Internet in small donations, emulated Dean’s fifty-state strategy by running candidates in red and blue states alike, and has begun to take over local Republican parties. The one major caveat is that Tea Party-backed candidates are now also receiving a flood of corporate money from the very G.O.P. establishment they’re claiming to oppose.

Your reporting includes a lot of time spent with Democrats in traditionally red states. What did you find interesting or perhaps even inspiring about their local organizing; and what does the scene look like today in those states where Obama won in 2008?

AriBerman.jpgI thought it was such rubbish when every pundit divided the electoral map into red and blue states in 2004. It was so obviously an oversimplification of the country we live in. And it turned out, in 2006 and 2008, that there were a lot of Democrats in places like western North Carolina or southern Indiana who were just waiting for an opportunity to assert themselves in the political process. And the party smartly made a decision to include, rather than neglect, them. I found the perseverance and tenacity of these red state Democratic activists to be quite amazing.

Nobody thought a guy named Barack Hussein Obama would win fifteen of eighteen delegates in Idaho, even in a Democratic primary, or could carry a place like Indiana in a general election, which hadn’t gone for a Democrat since 1964. The political map is much tougher for Obama and Democrats today than it was in 2008, and many places have grown more conservative, but the fact that Democrats won in these places shows that it’s possible and can happen again, even if states like Indiana revert back to the Republican column.

In your recent Times op-ed, you write about buyer’s remorse, even Dean’s own, about the new, more inclusive Democratic Party. What elements of Dean’s fifty-state strategy seem especially problematic today, and what still works?

In 2006, both Dean and Rahm Emanuel, who was then the chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, backed conservative Democrats who broke with the party on core issues, in an attempt to reclaim the majority and win in red states. That strategy proved successful and continued in 2008, but Democratic leaders didn’t give a lot of thought to how the very disparate elements of the big tent would work together and effectively govern. Not surprisingly, a number of these conservative Democrats have voted against the top priorities of the Obama administration and watered down or blocked progressive policies at pivotal moments—even though Democrats boasted a huge legislative supermajority. And that has made many Democrats, including Dean, quite unhappy and forced them to rethink the wisdom of the Party’s big-tent strategy. I think a fifty-state strategy is a great aspiration—political parties always want to allow room for growth—but not at the cost of undermining the main principles the Party is supposed to stand for. If you try to please everyone, sometimes you please no one—and that’s kind of where the Democrats are right now.

So much political analysis seems instantly disposable—either because conditions and “narratives” change so rapidly, or because certain analysis seems almost designed to be forgotten or rewritten when things change. In writing this book, how have you managed to create a document that can live outside, or endure, this election cycle and the ones to come?

There’s a significant amount of hopefully compelling history in the book, dating from 2003 to 2010, so I certainly hope people will be able to pick up my book years from now and find it a useful window into how politics and the country writ large changed at the beginning of the twenty-first century. I tried to write it more like a fast-paced literary history than a dry political-science text. I also think the fact that both the left and the right are doing grassroots politics now is a validation of the book’s thesis. I didn’t foresee the rise of the Tea Party when I started writing the book after Obama’s election, but in many ways that subject matter blends perfectly with the grassroots upheavals I chronicle in the narrative.

(Photograph: Jessica Dimmock.)

Posted on Oct 29th, 2010 by Ian Crouch in Ari Berman, Barack Obama, Democrats, George W. Bush, Howard Dean, Tea Party, The Exchange, midterm elections |

What the Candidates Should, and Shouldn’t, Be Reading

This post is part of The New Yorker’s ongoing coverage of the midterm elections.

Dem_v_Repub100.jpg

News that Barack Obama met with Jonathan Franzen at the White House this week got us thinking about what books some of the more famous midterm candidates might be reading in the last weekend of the campaign.

  • Sharron Angle: Shouldn’t be caught reading “The Manchurian Candidate,” after she told high school students last week that she has “been called the first Asian legislator in our Nevada State Assembly.” A better choice might be “Bringing Down the House,” about the M.I.T. students who ruffled some feathers in Vegas. Of course, should Angle win, she’d get a shot at dismantling the Senate.
  • Harry Reid: Might want to check out “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.” Angle’s competitor in the Nevada Senate race may not be the most likely reader of “Gonzo journalism,” but it would be more interesting than reading the want ads. Alternative choice for a weary warrior: Wallace Stegner’s “Angle of Repose.”
  • Christine O’Donnell: This Delaware sensation’s MySpace page lists “The Lord of the Rings Trilogy, Theology of the Body Explained, and Jane Eyre,” as her favorite books. Wizardry and sex, not good themes, though Brontë may be safe for this weekend. After her First Amendment gaffes, she may want to brush up on the law with the “Pocket Constitution.” Should avoid “Wicked.”
  • Andrew Cuomo: Poised to escape his father’s shadow, yet destined to continue the imperial line. Cuomo should leave his dog-eared copy of “I, Claudius,” on the nightstand until after Election Day.
  • Ben Quayle: The Congressional hopeful in Arizona could remind voters of his lineage with “The Sun Also Rises,” virility issues aside. Might want to hide his signed copy of “Dreams from My Father,” penned by the man he has called “the worst President in history.” If he’s aiming for higher office, should check out “How to Spell Like a Champ,” to learn when an “o” is enough.

Have any other ideas of what the candidates should or shouldn’t be reading? Share them with us in the comments below.

Posted on Oct 28th, 2010 by Ian Crouch in Andrew Cuomo, Barack Obama, Ben Quayle, Carl Paladino, Christine O’Donnell, Election, Harry Reid, John Boehner, Jonathan Franzen, Rand Paul, Sharron Angle |

In the News: Dangerously Young, Carny Lit

The Village Voice names Téa Obreht “Best New York Writer Young Enough to Make You Want to Slit Your Wrists.”

Inside the bleak but florid world of carny literature, the two-fingered man is king.

“A Story Before Bed,” an app that allows users to upload videos of themselves reading stories for their children, will give away a hundred thousand free recordings to military service personnel overseas.

Can’t get no satisfaction: why rock memoirs consistently disappoint.

College students still cling to paper textbooks despite heft, cost, and the availability of digital alternatives.

Going nowhere: travel writing is dead, and “Eat, Pray, Love” was the nail in the coffin.

A new study of brain injuries hints at the biological basis of creativity.

How to type in your own handwriting.

Madame Bovary, c’est moi: in defense of Flaubert’s much-maligned heroine.

Posted on Oct 22nd, 2010 by Jenny Hendrix in Barack Obama, Eat Pray Love, Flaubert, In the News, Madam Bovary, Tea Obrecht, Village Voice, Zadie Smith, bedtime stories, carny literature, creativity, entrepreneurs, handwriting, memoirs, rock n' roll memoirs, travel writing |

In the News: Celebrity Chekhov, Tolstoy Agonistes

In the hopes of making it onto the President’s reading list, an author throws a copy of his book at Obama during a rally.

Ben Greenman’s “Celebrity Chekhov” inaugurates a new mashup genre: “Tabloid Fiction.”

Public-service announcement: don’t click “free public WiFi” when writing remotely.

“He isn’t comfortable and he isn’t needed”: why Russia is ignoring the centenary of Tolstoy’s death.

Queasy Rothian coupling or jolly Cooperesque romp? On the unavoidable perils of writing a sex scene.

Are picture books a dying breed?

The ten best-dressed literary authors.

Brooklyn’s mysterious Underground Library cherishes the art of the printed word.

Carla Cohen, owner of the influential Washington D.C. bookshop Politics and Prose, has died at the age of seventy-three. Hendrik Hertzberg remembers her here.

Posted on Oct 13th, 2010 by Jenny Hendrix in Barack Obama, Carla Cohen, Chekov, In the News, Picture Books, Steig Larsson, Tolstoy, Underground Library, sex scenes, wifi |

Page 1 of 41234»