Book
Store



 Location:  Home» Books » Rock » The Rolling Stone Album Guide: Completely New Reviews: Every Essential Album, Every Essential Artist  
Books Home

  • Movie Store
  • Music Store
  • Game Store
  • Software Store
  • Tool Store
  • Shopping Mall
  • Categories
    Books
    Magazines
    Subcategories
    Paperback
    Mass Market
    Trade
    Related Categories
    • Rock
    Musical Genres
    Music
    Entertainment
    Subjects
    • Discographies & Buyer's Guides
    Reference
    Music
    Entertainment
    Subjects
    • General
    Theory, Composition & Performance
    Music
    Entertainment
    Subjects
    • General
    Music
    Entertainment
    Subjects
    Books
    • General AAS
    Music
    Entertainment
    Subjects
    Books
    • Paperback
    Binding (binding)
    Refinements
    Books
    • Printed Books
    Format (feature_browse-bin)
    Refinements
    Books

    The Rolling Stone Album Guide: Completely New Reviews: Every Essential Album, Every Essential Artist

    The Rolling Stone Album Guide: Completely New Reviews: Every Essential Album, Every Essential Artist
    Author: Rolling Stone Magazine
    Publisher: Random House
    Category: Book

    List Price: $20.00
    Buy Used: $0.01
    You Save: $19.99 (100%)



    New (10) Used (84) from $0.01

    Rating: 3.0 out of 5 stars 21 reviews
    Sales Rank: 846981

    Media: Paperback
    Edition: 3
    Pages: 838
    Number Of Items: 1
    Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.4
    Dimensions (in): 9.2 x 5.9 x 0.7

    ISBN: 0679737294
    Dewey Decimal Number: 781.660266
    EAN: 9780679737292
    ASIN: 0679737294

    Publication Date: October 27, 1992
    Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days

    Similar Items:

      • The New Rolling Stone Album Guide: Completely Revised and Updated 4th Edition
      • The New Rolling Stone Record Guide
      • The Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock & Roll (Revised and Updated for the 21st Century)
      • 500 Greatest Albums of All Times, The
      • All Music Guide to Rock: The Definitive Guide to Rock, Pop, and Soul (3rd Edition)

    Editorial Reviews:

    Product Description
    A completely revised edition of the bestselling guide to popular recordings--featuring 2,500 entries and more than 12,500 album reviews. The definitive guide for the `90s.


    Customer Reviews:   Read 16 more reviews...

    1 out of 5 stars Bilious Bilgewater   July 28, 2007
    1 out of 1 found this review helpful

    I'm happy to see that I am not alone in my loathing, not only for the book under review, but for ANYTHING to emanate from the Princes Of Superciliousness at Rolling Stone.

    First of all, let's look at the sub-title: "The Definitive Guide To The Best Of Rock-Pop-Rap-Jazz-Blues-Country-Soul-Folk & Gospel." OK. From that you might expect simply a compendium of the available albums of the major artists in any of the genres mentioned.

    But no. The writers have to proceed to dump all over those artists whose music appealed to the masses [example: "His name synonymous with soft porn shlock, Tom Jones remains a phenomenon of pandering and a marketing triumph."], while extolling the virtues of spaced-out drug-culture icons like The Velvet Underground - who most definitely did not attract mass attention.

    And that would be fine IF their book title included a further blurb along the lines of "and offering the very personal biases of the editorial staff."

    This is to be avoided at all costs. You would be better served by any of the books from Joel Whitburn at Billboard.

    As to what to do with my copy? Well, I recall Max Reger's response to a severe criticism of one of his works: "I am sitting in the smallest room of my house. I have your review before me. In a moment it will be behind me."



    2 out of 5 stars Not what I expected   October 13, 2005
    BerBar (Bakersfield, CA USA)
    4 out of 5 found this review helpful

    I bought this book about 5 years ago because I thought it would have help me out to approach to new music, but it didn't. It's unbelievable that one of the most important music publications could have done such a thing. This convinces me that Rolling Stone magazine is not a publication about music, but just a publication about best selling records and artists, which are not always the best ones.
    I just can't believe that this editors commissioned a Pop reviewer to write about Metal, Art Rock and Progressive Rock bands. What were they thinking? (that is if they were actually thinking).
    There should have been at least 12 (hopefully more) reviewers divided by genres.
    I would've give it one star if it wasn't for the fact that at least it gives you a "decent" list of the albums by an artist.
    Overall I think this is not a good purchase.



    4 out of 5 stars 1/2... A Standard in the Genre - A Personal Fave   August 27, 2005
    Takipsilim (Manila, Philippines)
    3 out of 3 found this review helpful

    I first purchased "The Rolling Stone Album Guide" back in '94 together with the "All Music Guide" edition of that year. I was a music-crazed, scatterbrained, hormonally-inflamed teen back then going through the turbulence of adolescence. I wasn't a reader then, but going through the pages of this book, browsing the snippets of reviews here and there, I was impressed and enthralled with the smart and memorable lines the talented reviewers would use to describe and stamp their collective marks on the artists and their recordings. Before the age of bilious Political-Correctness and mediocre music, this edition of Rolling Stone's ongoing music guide was a representative of it's time: an era of taste and quality matched with integrity and vision.

    Here one can find some of the most apt and most sound criticism ever penned or typed for the printed page. And a collection of artists chosen for their merit, not popularity. Thus one will find praise for artists as diverse as Elvis, The Beatles, Bob Dylan, The Rolling Stones, Jimi Hendrix, etc.. Rolling Stone started as a rag to chronicle and feature the Rock scene, hence the preponderance of Rock musicians in the book, but artists who influenced the course of Rock music and were influenced by it are well represented too: Robert Johnson, Miles Davis, John Coltrane, Charlie Parker, Muddy Waters, etc., are given their equal tribute. Other genres are economically touched on, and Rap, Folk, Country, and others are given just due. The writings are some of the very best, balancing seamless lines between worship, accuracy, humor, scathing word-bites, pathos, and knowledge.

    As admirable as this edition gets, there are some slips and tangles that come along, just like almost anything else. Some of the reviews are hilarious, perhaps inappropriately so (read the one on Gino Vannelli and laugh). Others are ridiculous, revealing the critics' prejudices and limitations (2 stars for Black Sabbath's "Vol.4"?. And the same for Slayer's "Reign in Blood"?.). And as one critic who I read from the net pointedly stated, somewhere along these lines, "Did they really listen to all of those recordings? What's with all of those old bluesmen all getting 5 stars?".

    After the passage of more than a decade, I still go back to this model of music criticism. I still appreciate the brevity and wit with which Messrs. Mark Coleman, J.D. Considine, Paul Evans, and David McGee shared their talents and efforts for future music fans to revel and cherish only the best in Popular Music.



    3 out of 5 stars An introduction to the most mainstream of rock criticism   July 13, 2004
    mianfei
    This book, I must confess, was a guide to listening (together with subsequent "Rolling Stone" reviews) for many years.

    On the whole, it has many virtues: the arguments are very sensible, the writers appear to be very well-qualified, and the selection of music included is varied enough to satisfy most listeners - especially someone like me who was looking then for music from the 1980s to listen to. There is very little outright lying: indeed most of the album reviews are very clearly written and do indeed provide an accurate description of the music being written about - something I wish I was able to do far better.

    However, this book's age gives it one fatal flaw: it does not understand the real impact of music over a long period. Many albums I bought on its recommendation have proved quite useless to me even if I understood the reasons (though my narrow perceptions at that time can in no way have helped me).

    Moreover, some of the albums it recommends (or at least does not condemn) would be violently condemned by critics like Joe Harrington and David Keenan whose knowledge and intelligence certainly exceeds that of those critics in this book. It is to them that I now recommend one turn for really accurate music criticism - I recommend their list to people who do not know much about msuic all the time. However, with older music I was never into back in the 1990s the book is actually more helpful and accurate due to greater hindsight, though many albums of great value were not then reissued.

    Thus, read with great caution: this is introductory, but good for that. there is better criticism - the problem is finding it and seeing for yourself.



    5 out of 5 stars best one out there   July 31, 2002
    buzzter (here&there)
    5 out of 6 found this review helpful

    Excellent and good fun. The New York Dolls review sums up the tone of this guide nicely. Definitely not for the Top 40 crowd though. If you're one of them, stay away as you'll probably get somewhat insulted.
    A drawback is that out of print albums were omitted, which makes the guide incomplete as soon as these albums are reissued. And of course the guide is outdated. Any guide is the moment is goes off to the presses.
    That said, we want an update now.



    Proud member of the Celebrity Pro Network. Make sure you check out these other great JimmyKat network sites:

    Lyrics Database   Celebrity Blog   Celebrity Thing   Celebrity PC   Latest Celebrity Photos   Web Portal   Travel Photos   Quotes   Flash Games


    Is there a better
    price available?


    Find out: